This is a repost & update of a blog I did for Rob Rogers back in 2014 on how to ask a conference question. Sadly the original post is no longer available. Since then the tongue in cheek algorithm (see below) has been shared thousands of times and it’s been a lot of fun. In large part it’s been universally accepted as a bit of a laugh. There have been some people who just can’t see the funny side (seriously – some people think it’s a real guideline!!). That’s kind of funny in itself with one individual even claiming that it was the most stupid thing in the history of science. Yep,……in….the…..history…..of……science. Wow! That is some accolade and a real badge of honor, though perhaps a little underserved 🙂 In any case we thought it would be fun to repost and update.
It’s also been taken on and shared by lots of people. That’s fine too as it’s not exactly our greatest academic work and won’t win any prizes, and it’s amusing to see evidence of the old aphorism that plagiarism is arguably the most sincere form of flattery. In truth I think the origins have been lost in the mists of the internet and so I’ve no problem seeing it pop up and get shared again this week in my timeline. However, seeing it once again has prompted me to repost the original blog after Nat found it on the wayback machine.
— Academia Obscura (@AcademiaObscura) August 25, 2017
So, that’s a bit of fun around a serious point. Time is precious for all of us and time in conferences where we can learn, interact and network is precious, too precious for it be wasted by irrelevant self centred questions, but it’s not enough for us to just complain and poke fun. We need to do this differently. We need to find a way of making sure that everyone has an opportunity to ask questions, that they are relevant, that they can be managed as part of a conference program and for us to hope that they will add value for everyone and not just to the person asking the question.
Is social media the bullet to fell Capt.Q?
SMACC have led the way in incorporating social media into conference questions. I’ve used their ideas as a speaker, questioner and as a session chair and I’m a big fan. Here’s how it works.
- 1. Session chair announces in advance that questions will only be taken via twitter.
- 2. A session hashtag is announced (this allows questions specific to the session to be easily found). e.g for a session on cooling post arrest at the CEM conference you might choose #CEMTTMQ
- 3. You need a separate ‘twitter monitor to assist the session chair. It’s too much for the chair to do both.
- 4. The twitter monitor selects questions for the chair to ask.
- 5. The chair asks the question on behalf of the questioner, ideally also identifies individual in audience so the speaker an direct the answer to them (that’s polite).
There are clear advantages to this approach. It allows a degree of control and avoids the truly irrelevant conversations but there are potential disadvantages such as these.
- 1. You have to have a twitter account! Not everyone has an account and that may disenfranchise some delegates (though this is a diminishing problem).
- 2. The chair may paraphrase the question and get it wrong. Having said that questions should be clear if confined to 140 characters. If they are not clear then they are probably not a great question.
- 3. The chair/monitor choose questions that ‘they’ think are important and that may not reflect the views of the audience. I don’t worry too much about this as it’s progress over an unfiltered approach from the random questioner. Consider it peer review.
- 4. Twitter attracts lots of questions and they cannot all be asked, but that’s no different to a real audience and that’s what the coffee break is for!
So, there are potential disadvantages, but on balance and having experienced the twitter solution to Capt. Question I’m a fan, and if like me you have experienced the burning hate of the irrelevant questioner you should really give it a try.
If you want to know more about being a twitter moderator at a conference then please read this excellent guide from DFTB and Eve Purdy, Chris Nickson and Ian Summers. Remember that it’s not about silencing the conversation, it’s about enhancing it, focusing it and getting the most out of the time available for both the audience and the speakers.
Finally, if all this is just a bit complicated I really do like the simplified version from our very own Chris Gray.
Rules for asking questions at a conference.
1. Your first sentence should be a question.
2. There should not be a second sentence.
— Chris Gray (@cgraydoc) January 9, 2018
We really hope you enjoy your next conferences and sincerly hope this does not put you off asking questions. We need the questions and debate, we just want the questions to be as good as they can be.
Before you go please don’t forget to…
- Subscribe to the blog (look top right for the link)
- Subscribe to our PODCAST on iTunes
- Follow us on twitter @stemlyns
- See our best pics and photos on Instagram
- PLEASE Like us on Facebook
- Find out more about the St.Emlyn’s team